Pets are a controversial issue here. Our declaration bans cats and dogs, yet there are several in the building. The board decided to “grandfather” the pets already in the building a few years ago. Anyone who desired a pet from that point forward could obtain one if it were required for “emotional support”. Now what kind of inconsistent policy is that?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>